Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic »

Productivity of argument structure constructions is a new emerging field within cognitive-functional linguistics. The term productivity as used in linguistic research contains at least three subconcepts: 'extensibility', 'regularity', and 'generality'. The focus in this study of case and argument structure constructions in Icelandic is on the concept of extensibility, while generality and regularity are regarded as derivative of extensibility. Productivity is considered to be a function of type frequency, semantic coherence, and the inverse correlation between these two. This study establishes productivity as an emergent feature of the grammatical system, in an analysis that is grounded in a usage-based constructional approach, where constructions are organized into lexicality-schematicity hierarchies. The view of syntactic productivity advocated here offers a unified account of productivity, in that it captures different degrees of productivity, ranging from highly productive patterns through various intermediate degrees of productivity to low-level analogical extensions.

Ch. 1 Introduction 1

Ch. 2 Productivity 9

Ch. 3 New verbs in Icelandic: A general outline 55

Ch. 4 Nonce verbs: A psycholinguistic experiment 101

Ch. 5 New verbs of communication: A questionnaire 119

Ch. 6 Old and Modern Icelandic: A frequency comparison 137

Ch. 7 Synthesis 171

References 183

App. A Case and argument structure constructions in the text corpora and the predicates which instantiate them 191

App. B Recent borrowings in Icelandic 199

App. C The questionnaire 201

Name index 203

Subject index 205

Constructions index 209