Authors: Cynthia L. Cates, Wayne McIntosh
ISBN-13: 9780313305191, ISBN-10: 0313305196
Format: Hardcover
Publisher: Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated
Date Published: October 1997
Edition: (Non-applicable)
WAYNE V. McINTOSH is Associate Professor in the Department of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland, College Park.
CYNTHIA L. CATES is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Towson University.
A fresh and provocative perspective on the judicial process and the transmission of ideas into law. Professors McIntosh and Cates demonstrate, through the actions and writings of such diverse jurists as Louis Brandeis, Sandra Day O'Connor, Jerome Frank, and Hans Linde, how judges' pet intellectual projects become the fodder for new ideas in the law.
Through a series of case studies, Professors McIntosh and Cates argue for the assessment of judicial activity from a fresh perspective. They focus on the appellate system and those judges who help to move the lawi.e., entrepreneurs. Appeals court judges are in a unique position in that they are presented with real opportunities to influence the shape and meaning of law.
Jurists have special interests, some areas of the law that particularly attract them. When questions arise in these fields, jurists are likely to seize the moment, allowing them to express their expertise and be creative. This is not only a natural course for highly motivated individuals, but also a mode of operation that is important to the development of our law. Through an examination of the actions and writings of such diverse jurists as Louis Brandeis, Sandra Day O'Connor, Jerome Frank, and Hans Linde, the authors explore this concept of entrepreneurship, in which judges take on and promote their pet projects. Of great interest to scholars and researchers in political science and law, and those concerned with judicial process and behavior, and court policymaking.
Proposes the idea that judges can act as entrepreneurs when they advance ideas for jurisprudential consideration and that entrepreneurship can be a useful concept for understanding the intellectual contests involved in legal reasoning. Evidence is drawn from the writings of four judges who are seen as judicial entrepreneurs: Jerome Frank, Sandra Day O'Connor, Hans Linde, and Louis Brandeis. Annotation c. by Book News, Inc., Portland, Or.
Preface | ||
Introduction | ||
1 | Judicial Entrepreneurship: Selling Jurisprudence | 1 |
2 | Louis Brandeis: The Consummate Entrepreneur | 23 |
3 | Jerome Frank: The Art of the Hard Sell | 47 |
4 | Hans Linde: Interstate Trade in Legal Ideas | 67 |
5 | Sandra Day O'Connor: The Soft Selling of the Guarantee Clause | 91 |
6 | Conclusions | 105 |
Selected Bibliography | 119 | |
Index | 125 |