$45.00
FREE Returns
FREE delivery May 26 - 28
Or fastest delivery May 22 - 24
Usually ships within 3 to 5 days
$$45.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$45.00
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
30-day easy returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Returns
30-day easy returns
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic Paperback – Download: Adobe Reader, September 1, 2007

4.0 4.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$45.00","priceAmount":45.00,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"45","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"00","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"U8CKBI4NwqsUiRM39xJv8RBg0%2Fdpp6mXchpmPOWuNuH9erZbGHLoG1I%2BTAqeA73TIlLxjfBinga18on%2B4VAJpTkHXqDGu7LmrvCx4a63kItOHTuhCTB7AFMfdqAmpo0TBoG02XTjooc%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

In Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic, Alexandra Cuffel analyzes medieval Jewish, Christian, and Muslim uses of gendered bodily imagery and metaphors of impurity in their visual and verbal polemic against one another. Drawing from a rich array of sources―including medical texts, bestiaries, Muslim apocalyptic texts, midrash, biblical commentaries, kabbalistic literature, Hebrew liturgical poetry, and theological tracts from late antiquity to the mid-fourteenth century―Cuffel examines attitudes toward the corporeal body and its relationship to divinity. She shows that these religious traditions shared notions of the human body as distasteful, with many believers viewing corporeality and communion with the divine as incompatible. In particular, she explores how authors from each religious tradition targeted the woman’s body as antithetical to holiness.

Foul smell, bodily fluids and states, and animals were employed by these religious communities as powerful tropes, which they used to mark their religious opponents as sinful, filthy, and unacceptable. By defining and denigrating the religious “other,” each group wielded bodily insult as a means of resistance, of inciting violence, and of creating community boundaries. Representations of impurity or filth designed to inspire revulsion served also to reassure audiences of their religious and sometimes physical superiority and to encourage oppressive measures toward the minority.

Yet, even in the midst of opposing one another, their very polemic demonstrates that Jews, Christians, and Muslims held basic cultural assumptions and symbols in common while inflecting their meanings differently.

Read more Read less

The Amazon Book Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Editorial Reviews

Review

“Alexandra Cuffel's bold study interprets the inter-religious polemic of medieval Jews, Christians and Muslims in the context of late-antique disgust for the body, especially the female body, shared by all three traditions. This will be a very influential book for medievalists in many fields.” ―E. Ann Matter, University of Pennsylvania



“With Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic, Alexandra Cuffel has produced a remarkably original, ambitious, and important book that sets the agenda for future discussions.” ―Peter Biller, University of York



“Analyzes Christian, Jewish, and Muslim uses of gendered body imagery and metaphors of impurity in polemics against one another from late antiquity to the mid-14th century.” ―The Chronicle of Higher Education



“. . . Cuffel ponders the psychologically disturbing fact that Islamic, Jewish, and Christian medieval polemic equated the feminine with pollution and then, in turn, gendered the despised Other as feminine. Through both her noteworthy ability to work with Ancient Greek, Latin, Hebrew, and Arabic texts and her skill for locating unsettling divisive polemic, Cuffel’s book in many ways has no peer. A necessary text for anyone interested in the subject of medieval Otherness because of the wealth of information amassed in one volume. . . . Cuffel’s Gendering Disgust offers a refreshing view of medieval religious polemic, and for this reason, Cuffel’s book should not be limited to readers interested only in gender studies.” ―Church History



“What started out as jokes at a conference evolved into a full academic study of filth and impurity as religious insult in medieval Europe. Cuffel explores how particularly Jews and Christians, but also Muslims, used filth and ritual pollution to denigrate the religious other, and why it was so powerful among writers and artists.” ―Research Book News



"Alexandra Cuffel's book is ultimately about commonality among medieval Christians, Jews and Muslims. They shared the same insults against one another and understood them. Thus, according to Cuffel, they shared a common language of polemic, and their insults, based in a common vocabulary of bodily disgust, reveal underlying common beliefs about the body, sickness, gender, certain foods, and animals." ―Comitatus



“Alexandra Cuffel succeeds in constructing a masterful analysis of the complex development of religious polemics among medieval Christian, Jewish, and Muslim communities. . . . Overall, Cuffel has produced a seminal work in the use of gendered metaphors of the body in medieval religious polemics.” ―Medieval Feminist Forum 44.2



“Alexandra Cuffel engages in extraordinarily incisive analysis of a chronologically and linguistically breathtaking range of texts that explore the rhetoric of physical disgust in the polemic literature of Christians, Muslims, and Jews against one another. One cannot help but be impressed with the breadth of Cuffel’s analysis and by the manner in which her command of the sources in Latin, Hebrew, Arabic, and various vernaculars enables her to see both surfaces of the polemics at hand.” ―American Historical Review



“Cuffel's work, through its emphasis on the role of bodily functions in religious polemic, contributes greatly to our understanding of interfaith and intercommunal relations in late antique and medieval cultures. What is most compelling about Gendering Disgust is the sheer volume of provocative and entertaining examples Cuffel employs to illustrate these compelling theoretical points.” ―Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies



“Alexandra Cuffel’s Gendering Disgust takes the evolving field of medieval religious polemics into welcome new directions that build on different scholarly traditions, which she has combined in new and exciting ways. Cuffel’s extraordinarily stimulating new book extends the discussion further precisely in intercultural directions. Overall, Cuffel is to be congratulated for a book that is a very welcome addition to the growing field of medieval body studies, gender studies, history of emotions, as well as of interreligious cultural polemics.” ―Speculum

About the Author

Alexandra Cuffel is assistant professor of history at Macalester College.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ University of Notre Dame Press; 1st edition (September 1, 2007)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 448 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0268023670
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0268023676
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.45 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.98 x 9 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.0 4.0 out of 5 stars 3 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Alexandra Cuffel
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5
3 global ratings

Top review from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2009
Alexandra Cuffel's Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic explores the conceptions of bodily filth and ritual pollution, especially regarding the female body, in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim texts. Chronologically her study stretches from Late Antiquity to the Middle Ages, focusing on the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Cuffel's primary argument is that a group of shared beliefs and values about the body existed among Jews, Christians, Muslims, and, early on, Greco-Roman Pagans, and that they used similar tactics to degrade the "other". By evoking impurity and bodily filth these religions created "theological and emotional obstacles between themselves and those with whom they disagreed" (47). Often, Christians and Muslims used this imagery to convince their followers to join in holy war. The Jews, a minority religion, used similar tactics that often endangered themselves and their entire local community, yet still demonstrated their own superiority. This study, in part, seeks to answer the basic questions concerning the "function of polemic in each group" (5). Despite addressing the broader conceptions of disease and ritual cleanliness, Cuffel never strays far from her central focus, the perceptions of the female body, especially of the womb and menstrual blood. She seeks to understand why women's bodies, more than men's, were associated with "dirt, waste, and rot" thus constructing "'female' as a negative ontological category in relation to the spiritual world" (26).

Gendering Disgust is divided into two parts. Part I begins by briefly establishing the Greek and Roman groundwork regarding the human body, shaped by Pliny and Aristotle, and then traces these developments in Late Antiquity. She addresses the influential Galenic and Aristotelian medical schema that "automatically distances women from the divine" (27) and argues that late antiquity saw attitudes towards the "body, gender, and religious deviance first coalesce to form a particular form of polemic shared" by Christians, Pagans, and Jews (11). Having establishing this groundwork, Cuffel then concentrates on the Jewish and Pagan polemics that sought to degrade Christians by pointing out the problem of placing Jesus in a "filthy" womb, and the Christian responses. Likewise, Jesus' need to eat, defecate, and urinate were seen as indicators that Jesus was not Divine (78). Also, Cuffel analyses the Christian polemics against the newly formed Islamic religion. Christians argued that Muhammad and his followers sought physical rewards and insisted that Muhammad's heaven was a "licentious, obscene place" (76).

Part II addresses the use of impurity in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim invective from twelfth-, thirteenth-, and early-fourteenth-century Europe. With the growing medieval Christian piety based on Christ's humanity and the status of Virgin Mary, the "filthy" womb of the Virgin Mother was an increasingly egregious point of attack (108). As Jewish polemic increasingly attacked the doctrine of incarnation, Christians responded by formulating a theology of Mary's body that "set her flesh above the corruptible impurity characterizing" human existence (109). In addition, Cuffel argues that the twelfth-century saw an increase in the number of scholars from all three religions translating each other's primary religious texts and medical texts in order to construct more persuasive polemics (96-97).

The last chapter of Part II shifts to the field of visual art. Although Cuffel's central focus is on the "filth" of the female body, she also examines the ways in which religious writers used animal imagery to "remind viewers of moral tales and relatively complex theological ideas" (198). For example, Christians often associated farm animals with the Jews to emphasize their "servile" status. Jews similarly depicted Christians as swine, "the most impure of all creatures" and long associated with dirt, disease, and heresy (224). Cuffel links this section with her arguments on the female body. She suggests that these visual traditions often tied "one's opponent to a filthy animal served to feminize him because of women's strong association with dirt and impurity" (200).

Alexandra Cuffel gathers together a diverse and wide-ranging collection of Pagan, Muslim, Christian, and Jewish primary source material in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and vernacular languages to support her arguments. These include medical texts, Bible moralisée, poetry, chronicles, biblical commentaries, and other religious texts. Cuffel also extensively utilizes the visual arts, including stained glass windows, church wall carvings, and manuscript illustrations. This is a pioneering work, in part because Cuffel's knowledge of Hebrew, Latin, and Arabic allow her to bring together religious texts that had often only been individually studied before.

Alexandra Cuffel's Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic succeeds in tackling a difficult subject, both in its chronology and content. Many sections of her book address subject material long ignored by historians either due to lack of translated sources (perceptions of the body in medieval Islamic religious polemic) or historiographic, political, and social forces (Jewish anti-Christian polemic) (2). Cuffel's central argument that the "filth" of the female body was an integral part of the religious polemic between Pagans, Jews, Christians, and Muslims and Cuffel is intelligent and focused. Overall, Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic is an audacious, scholarly, and engaging analysis.
4 people found this helpful
Report