Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic Paperback – Download: Adobe Reader, September 1, 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
In Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic, Alexandra Cuffel analyzes medieval Jewish, Christian, and Muslim uses of gendered bodily imagery and metaphors of impurity in their visual and verbal polemic against one another. Drawing from a rich array of sources―including medical texts, bestiaries, Muslim apocalyptic texts, midrash, biblical commentaries, kabbalistic literature, Hebrew liturgical poetry, and theological tracts from late antiquity to the mid-fourteenth century―Cuffel examines attitudes toward the corporeal body and its relationship to divinity. She shows that these religious traditions shared notions of the human body as distasteful, with many believers viewing corporeality and communion with the divine as incompatible. In particular, she explores how authors from each religious tradition targeted the woman’s body as antithetical to holiness.
Foul smell, bodily fluids and states, and animals were employed by these religious communities as powerful tropes, which they used to mark their religious opponents as sinful, filthy, and unacceptable. By defining and denigrating the religious “other,” each group wielded bodily insult as a means of resistance, of inciting violence, and of creating community boundaries. Representations of impurity or filth designed to inspire revulsion served also to reassure audiences of their religious and sometimes physical superiority and to encourage oppressive measures toward the minority.
Yet, even in the midst of opposing one another, their very polemic demonstrates that Jews, Christians, and Muslims held basic cultural assumptions and symbols in common while inflecting their meanings differently.
- Print length448 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherUniversity of Notre Dame Press
- Publication dateSeptember 1, 2007
- Dimensions6 x 0.98 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100268023670
- ISBN-13978-0268023676
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Alexandra Cuffel's bold study interprets the inter-religious polemic of medieval Jews, Christians and Muslims in the context of late-antique disgust for the body, especially the female body, shared by all three traditions. This will be a very influential book for medievalists in many fields.” ―E. Ann Matter, University of Pennsylvania
“With Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic, Alexandra Cuffel has produced a remarkably original, ambitious, and important book that sets the agenda for future discussions.” ―Peter Biller, University of York
“Analyzes Christian, Jewish, and Muslim uses of gendered body imagery and metaphors of impurity in polemics against one another from late antiquity to the mid-14th century.” ―The Chronicle of Higher Education
“. . . Cuffel ponders the psychologically disturbing fact that Islamic, Jewish, and Christian medieval polemic equated the feminine with pollution and then, in turn, gendered the despised Other as feminine. Through both her noteworthy ability to work with Ancient Greek, Latin, Hebrew, and Arabic texts and her skill for locating unsettling divisive polemic, Cuffel’s book in many ways has no peer. A necessary text for anyone interested in the subject of medieval Otherness because of the wealth of information amassed in one volume. . . . Cuffel’s Gendering Disgust offers a refreshing view of medieval religious polemic, and for this reason, Cuffel’s book should not be limited to readers interested only in gender studies.” ―Church History
“What started out as jokes at a conference evolved into a full academic study of filth and impurity as religious insult in medieval Europe. Cuffel explores how particularly Jews and Christians, but also Muslims, used filth and ritual pollution to denigrate the religious other, and why it was so powerful among writers and artists.” ―Research Book News
"Alexandra Cuffel's book is ultimately about commonality among medieval Christians, Jews and Muslims. They shared the same insults against one another and understood them. Thus, according to Cuffel, they shared a common language of polemic, and their insults, based in a common vocabulary of bodily disgust, reveal underlying common beliefs about the body, sickness, gender, certain foods, and animals." ―Comitatus
“Alexandra Cuffel succeeds in constructing a masterful analysis of the complex development of religious polemics among medieval Christian, Jewish, and Muslim communities. . . . Overall, Cuffel has produced a seminal work in the use of gendered metaphors of the body in medieval religious polemics.” ―Medieval Feminist Forum 44.2
“Alexandra Cuffel engages in extraordinarily incisive analysis of a chronologically and linguistically breathtaking range of texts that explore the rhetoric of physical disgust in the polemic literature of Christians, Muslims, and Jews against one another. One cannot help but be impressed with the breadth of Cuffel’s analysis and by the manner in which her command of the sources in Latin, Hebrew, Arabic, and various vernaculars enables her to see both surfaces of the polemics at hand.” ―American Historical Review
“Cuffel's work, through its emphasis on the role of bodily functions in religious polemic, contributes greatly to our understanding of interfaith and intercommunal relations in late antique and medieval cultures. What is most compelling about Gendering Disgust is the sheer volume of provocative and entertaining examples Cuffel employs to illustrate these compelling theoretical points.” ―Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies
“Alexandra Cuffel’s Gendering Disgust takes the evolving field of medieval religious polemics into welcome new directions that build on different scholarly traditions, which she has combined in new and exciting ways. Cuffel’s extraordinarily stimulating new book extends the discussion further precisely in intercultural directions. Overall, Cuffel is to be congratulated for a book that is a very welcome addition to the growing field of medieval body studies, gender studies, history of emotions, as well as of interreligious cultural polemics.” ―Speculum
About the Author
Alexandra Cuffel is assistant professor of history at Macalester College.
Product details
- Publisher : University of Notre Dame Press; 1st edition (September 1, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 448 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0268023670
- ISBN-13 : 978-0268023676
- Item Weight : 1.45 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.98 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,205,724 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #847 in Women & Judaism
- #2,625 in Gender & Sexuality in Religious Studies (Books)
- #3,611 in Renaissance Literary Criticism (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top review from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Gendering Disgust is divided into two parts. Part I begins by briefly establishing the Greek and Roman groundwork regarding the human body, shaped by Pliny and Aristotle, and then traces these developments in Late Antiquity. She addresses the influential Galenic and Aristotelian medical schema that "automatically distances women from the divine" (27) and argues that late antiquity saw attitudes towards the "body, gender, and religious deviance first coalesce to form a particular form of polemic shared" by Christians, Pagans, and Jews (11). Having establishing this groundwork, Cuffel then concentrates on the Jewish and Pagan polemics that sought to degrade Christians by pointing out the problem of placing Jesus in a "filthy" womb, and the Christian responses. Likewise, Jesus' need to eat, defecate, and urinate were seen as indicators that Jesus was not Divine (78). Also, Cuffel analyses the Christian polemics against the newly formed Islamic religion. Christians argued that Muhammad and his followers sought physical rewards and insisted that Muhammad's heaven was a "licentious, obscene place" (76).
Part II addresses the use of impurity in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim invective from twelfth-, thirteenth-, and early-fourteenth-century Europe. With the growing medieval Christian piety based on Christ's humanity and the status of Virgin Mary, the "filthy" womb of the Virgin Mother was an increasingly egregious point of attack (108). As Jewish polemic increasingly attacked the doctrine of incarnation, Christians responded by formulating a theology of Mary's body that "set her flesh above the corruptible impurity characterizing" human existence (109). In addition, Cuffel argues that the twelfth-century saw an increase in the number of scholars from all three religions translating each other's primary religious texts and medical texts in order to construct more persuasive polemics (96-97).
The last chapter of Part II shifts to the field of visual art. Although Cuffel's central focus is on the "filth" of the female body, she also examines the ways in which religious writers used animal imagery to "remind viewers of moral tales and relatively complex theological ideas" (198). For example, Christians often associated farm animals with the Jews to emphasize their "servile" status. Jews similarly depicted Christians as swine, "the most impure of all creatures" and long associated with dirt, disease, and heresy (224). Cuffel links this section with her arguments on the female body. She suggests that these visual traditions often tied "one's opponent to a filthy animal served to feminize him because of women's strong association with dirt and impurity" (200).
Alexandra Cuffel gathers together a diverse and wide-ranging collection of Pagan, Muslim, Christian, and Jewish primary source material in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and vernacular languages to support her arguments. These include medical texts, Bible moralisée, poetry, chronicles, biblical commentaries, and other religious texts. Cuffel also extensively utilizes the visual arts, including stained glass windows, church wall carvings, and manuscript illustrations. This is a pioneering work, in part because Cuffel's knowledge of Hebrew, Latin, and Arabic allow her to bring together religious texts that had often only been individually studied before.
Alexandra Cuffel's Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic succeeds in tackling a difficult subject, both in its chronology and content. Many sections of her book address subject material long ignored by historians either due to lack of translated sources (perceptions of the body in medieval Islamic religious polemic) or historiographic, political, and social forces (Jewish anti-Christian polemic) (2). Cuffel's central argument that the "filth" of the female body was an integral part of the religious polemic between Pagans, Jews, Christians, and Muslims and Cuffel is intelligent and focused. Overall, Gendering Disgust in Medieval Religious Polemic is an audacious, scholarly, and engaging analysis.